In general, if someone has the means to choose between TBC or C3D I'd always recommend C3D. Want to edit a polyline in C3D? Grab a grip, move it.
In C3D - type "pl" (or click button), draw (use coordinates if you want, or snap to points/features, etc). It involves use of menus, and unnecessary nonsense like that. That said, C3D is more flexible, and more robust with what you can do with surfaces, sections, basic drafting, page layout setups, etc.įor example, just creating and editing a "polyline" in TBC is SO CUMBERSOME. It handles viewing surfaces quite nicely, and more efficiently and "usably" than what I've seen in C3D. TBC is actually pretty good for quite a bit of what you've listed. It sounds like C3D may be a bit overkill if you're mostly just doing volumes/reporting. Trimble Business Center - $5,000 (additional $900 every two years or so for updates. Visually represent cut/fill by elevation and color. Compare surfaces and create volume report. Edit TIN surfaces (swap triangles, delete by boundary, add triangles, create points from surface, merge surfaces Create boundaries and delete data by boundary Insert background images, aligns background images manually or set scale Modify arcs, strings, opens and close strings, move and rotate data Insert points, arcs, text, images, arrow Switch between porjections, datums and geoids Some features that I use from Magnet Office regularly are.
#Trimble business center hce manual pdf
pdf with a title block, logo, tables, surface contours etc. Is Civil3D overkill for me? I prepare the volumes in a. I am working in earthworks and most of what I provide to the company is cut/fill volume reports and stockpile volume reports. We have Trimble and Topcon machine control and being able to support Trimble file formats is important to me.
I have been looking for an alternative to Magnet Office and I am heavily leaning towards Trimble Business Center. I am working for a construction company and we have been having regular problems with Magnet Office (Topcon) crashing resulting in delays.
0 kommentar(er)
